
Gianni Infantino abandoned a proposal to sell a 20% stake in a FIFA commercial subsidiary after UEFA threatened to withdraw its 55 member nations.
FIFA President Gianni Infantino shelved a proposal on Friday night to spin off a commercial subsidiary and sell a 20% stake to private investors, specifically Thrive Capital. The reported deal valued FIFA at $20 billion, a figure critics noted was a round number negotiated behind closed doors rather than through a proper tender process. This maneuver occurred despite FIFA holding approximately $2.7 billion in cash reserves prior to the 2026 World Cup. During his 10-year tenure, Infantino has quadrupled funding for the 211 member associations and oversaw a seven-fold increase in global soccer-related project investments.
Recent administrative actions included the suspension of USMNT striker Folarin Balogun following his red card midway through the 2026 World Cup and the awarding of the 2034 World Cup to Saudi Arabia without a formal bidding process. The proposed commercial sell-off faced a strict approval deadline of Sept. 19, a timeline that contributed to the eventual collapse of the project. Internal friction resulted in the resignations of chief operating officer Kevin Lamour and senior adviser Carlos Cordeiro, both of whom voiced opposition before their departures.
UEFA Resistance and Ethical Concerns
UEFA led the opposition by threatening to pull its 55 member nations out of FIFA competitions, a move that would have rendered those tournaments economically worthless. In a formal statement, UEFA argued that external ownership would create a permanent obligation for commercial returns and daily pressure from investor expectations. The governing body likened the proposal to selling equity in a military, stating that certain entities should be governed by elected officials rather than the bottom line. This backlash forced the U-turn just months before the FIFA elections scheduled for next March.
Financial Standing and Strategic Rationale
Critics questioned the necessity of the Thrive Capital deal, noting that FIFA just delivered the most lucrative sporting event in history. With $2.7 billion in reserves and a high credit rating, the organization possesses the capital to scale business operations without surrendering equity. The involvement of Josh Kushner and Thrive Capital was framed as bringing in strategic partners, yet opponents argued that FIFA could hire experts directly using its existing cash flow. The lack of a no-bid contract process drew comparisons to "Shark Tank" and "Dragons' Den," with analysts suggesting that a public pitch would have likely yielded a higher valuation than the $20 billion figure.
Political Implications for Infantino
Infantino’s leadership now faces uncertainty, with potential scenarios including a vote of no confidence, a loss in the March elections, or the withdrawal of his candidacy. While he maintains support from many of the 211 member associations who rely on FIFA cash to function, the failed sell-off follows other unsuccessful gambles such as the SoftBank deal and the biennial World Cup proposal. The timing of the Sept. 19 deadline was particularly scrutinized, as it arrived while nominations for the presidency remained open. Despite the recent financial success of the 2026 tournament, the attempt to monetize future revenues through private equity has led to claims that his role is becoming untenable.
Reader conversation
Your take on the story
React
Sign in to add your reaction.
Stay with the story
More in Soccer
Open desk
Inter Miami Denies Interest in Free Agent Midfielder Juan Fernando Quintero

Flick Confirms Rashford Exit as Barça Sign Gordon and Adeyemi
